No major opinion on the "cloud offerings" piece, but I agree people should know what they are getting into, and be able to make an informed decision. However, if someone is going down that path, I would hope they do the due-diligence to make sure it fits their requirements.
1 small update I would suggest. It seems like Datastax Spring Boot entry would go in development frameworks as opposed to the sidecar section. On Tue, Jun 22, 2021, 5:39 PM bened...@apache.org <bened...@apache.org> wrote: > Under Cloud Offerings, are we comfortable implicitly endorsing “API > compatible” offerings that aren’t actually Cassandra, and also don’t (as > far as I am aware) fully support Cassandra functionality? Should we at > least mention that this is the case? > > > From: Melissa Logan <meli...@constantia.io> > Date: Tuesday, 22 June 2021 at 21:39 > To: u...@cassandra.apache.org <u...@cassandra.apache.org>, > dev@cassandra.apache.org <dev@cassandra.apache.org> > Subject: Additions to Cassandra ecosystem page? > Hi all, > > The Cassandra community recently updated its website and has added several > new entries to the Ecosystem page: https://cassandra.apache.org/ecosystem/ > . > > If you have edits or know of other third-party Cassandra projects, tools, > products, etc that may be useful to others -- please get in touch and we'll > add to the next round of site updates in July. > > Thanks! > > Melissa > Apache Cassandra Contributor >
