Point of order: our project governance states <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Cassandra+Project+Governance> ,
"Once the proposal is finalized and any major committer dissent reconciled, call a [VOTE] on the ML to have the proposal adopted. The criteria for acceptance is consensus (3 binding +1 votes and no binding vetoes). The vote should remain open for 72 hours." No provision is made for declaring a CEP, or part of it, to be subject to a simple majority vote simply by claiming it's directional. On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 11:32 AM bened...@apache.org <bened...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to start a vote on this CEP, split into three sub-decisions, > as discussion has been circular for some time. > > 1. Do you support adopting this CEP? > 2. Do you support the transaction semantics proposed by the CEP for > Cassandra? > 3. Do you support an incremental approach to developing transactions in > Cassandra, leaving scope for future development? > > The first vote is a consensus vote of all committers, the second and third > however are about project direction and therefore are simple majority votes > of the PMC. > > Recall that all -1 votes must be accompanied by an explanation. If you > reject the CEP only on grounds (2) or (3) you should not veto the proposal. > If a majority reject grounds (2) or (3) then transaction developments will > halt for the time being. > > This vote will be open for 72 hours. > -- Jonathan Ellis co-founder, http://www.datastax.com @spyced
