+1 > On Jan 12, 2022, at 8:39 AM, Joseph Lynch <joe.e.ly...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:25 AM Berenguer Blasi > <berenguerbl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> jenkins CI was at 2/3 flakies consistently post 4.0 release. > > That is really impressive and I absolutely don't mean to downplay that > achievement. > >> Then things broke and we've been working hard to get back to the 2/3 >> flakies. Most >> current failures imo are timeuuid C17133 or early termination of process >> C17140 related afaik. So getting back to the 2/3 'impossible' flakies >> should be doable and a reasonable target (famous last words...). My 2cts. > > I really appreciate all the work folks have been doing to get the > project to green, and I support the parts of the proposal that try to > formalize methods to try to keep us there. I am only objecting to #2 > in the proposal where we have a non-negotiable gate on tests before a > release. > > -Joey
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our C... Joseph Lynch
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our C... Joshua McKenzie
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our C... Caleb Rackliffe
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our C... Michael Shuler
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our C... Ekaterina Dimitrova
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our C... Yifan Cai
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our C... Brandon Williams
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our C... Mick Semb Wever
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our C... Joseph Lynch
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our CI pr... Joseph Lynch
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our C... David Capwell
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our C... Berenguer Blasi
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our C... Sam Tunnicliffe
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our C... Joshua McKenzie
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our CI process Joseph Lynch
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our CI process Mick Semb Wever
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our CI process Brandon Williams
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our CI process C. Scott Andreas
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our CI process Jeremiah D Jordan
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our CI process Andrés de la Peña
- Re: [VOTE] Formalizing our CI process Francisco Guerrero