+1 with/without amendment
> On 13 Jan 2022, at 05:26, Berenguer Blasi <berenguerbl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Oh I completely agree with you. I was just trying to explain that
> getting to 2/3 failures is a realistic target.
>
> +1 also on the amendment.
>
> On 12/1/22 17:39, Joseph Lynch wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:25 AM Berenguer Blasi
>> <berenguerbl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> jenkins CI was at 2/3 flakies consistently post 4.0 release.
>> That is really impressive and I absolutely don't mean to downplay that
>> achievement.
>>
>>> Then things broke and we've been working hard to get back to the 2/3
>>> flakies. Most
>>> current failures imo are timeuuid C17133 or early termination of process
>>> C17140 related afaik. So getting back to the 2/3 'impossible' flakies
>>> should be doable and a reasonable target (famous last words...). My 2cts.
>> I really appreciate all the work folks have been doing to get the
>> project to green, and I support the parts of the proposal that try to
>> formalize methods to try to keep us there. I am only objecting to #2
>> in the proposal where we have a non-negotiable gate on tests before a
>> release.
>>
>> -Joey
>> .
