I think it would be great to onboard Harry more officially into the project. However it would be nice to perhaps do some sanity checking outside of Apple folks to see how approachable it is. That is, can someone take it and just run it with the current readme without any additional context?
I wonder if a mini-onboarding session would be good as a community session - go over Harry, how to run it, how to add a test? Would that be the right venue? I just would like to see how we can not only plug it in to regular CI but get everyone that wants to add a test be able to know how to get started with it. Jeremy > On May 16, 2023, at 1:34 PM, Abe Ratnofsky <a...@aber.io> wrote: > > Just to make sure I'm understanding the details, this would mean > apache/cassandra-harry maintains its status as a separate repository, > apache/cassandra references it as a submodule, and clones and builds Harry > locally, rather than pulling a released JAR. We can then reference Harry as a > library without maintaining public artifacts for it. Is that in line with > what you're thinking? > > > I'd also like to see us get a Harry run integrated as part of our > > pre-commit CI > > I'm a strong supporter of this, of course. > >> On May 16, 2023, at 11:03 AM, Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Similar to what we've done with accord in >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18204, I'd like to discuss >> bringing cassandra-harry in-tree as a submodule. repo link: >> https://github.com/apache/cassandra-harry >> >> Given the value it's brought to the project's stabilization efforts and the >> movement of other things in the ecosystem to being more integrated (accord, >> build-scripts https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18133), I >> think having the testing framework better localized and integrated would be >> a net benefit for adoption, awareness, maintenance, and tighter workflows as >> we troubleshoot future failures it surfaces. >> >> I'd also like to see us get a Harry run integrated as part of our pre-commit >> CI (a 5 minute simple soak test for instance) and having that local in this >> fashion should make that a cleaner integration as well. >> >> Thoughts? >
