+1
> On 5 Oct 2023, at 10:35, Benedict <bened...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Surely it needs to be shared with the foundation and the PMC so we can
> verify? Or at least have ASF legal confirm they have received and are
> satisfied with the tarball? It certainly can’t be kept private to DS, AFAICT.
>
> Of course it shouldn’t be shared publicly but not sure how PMC can fulfil its
> verification function here without it.
>
>> On 5 Oct 2023, at 10:23, Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 at 13:25, Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org
>> <mailto:jmcken...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>> I see now this will likely be instead apache/cassandra-java-driver
>>> I was wondering about that. apache/java-driver seemed pretty broad. :)
>>>
>>> From the linked page:
>>> Check that all active committers have a signed CLA on record. TODO – attach
>>> list
>>> I've been part of these discussions and work so am familiar with the status
>>> of it (as well as guidance and clearance from the foundation re: folks we
>>> couldn't reach) - but might be worthwhile to link to the sheet or perhaps
>>> instead provide a summary of the 49 java contributors, their CLA signing
>>> status, attempts to reach out, etc for other PMC members that weren't
>>> actively involved back when we were working through it.
>>
>>
>>
>> We have a spreadsheet with this information, and the tarball of all the
>> signed CLAs.
>> The tarball we should keep private to DS, but know that we have it for
>> governance's sake.
>>
>> I've attached the spreadsheet to the CEP confluence page.
