> > If we end up not releasing a final 5.0 artifact by a Cassandra Summit it > will signal to the community that we’re prioritizing stability and it could > be a good opportunity to get people to test the beta or RC before we stamp > it as production ready. >
I agree with Paulo's comment czw., 30 lis 2023 o 04:44 Paulo Motta <pa...@apache.org> napisał(a): > > if any contributor has an opinion which is not technically refuted it > will usually be backed by a PMC via a binding -1 > > clarifying a bit my personal view: if any contributor has an opinion > against a proposal (in this case this release proposal) that is not refuted > it will usually be backed by a PMC via binding -1 > > Opinions supporting the proposal are also valuable, provided there are no > valid claims against a proposal. > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 22:27 Paulo Motta <pa...@apache.org> wrote: > >> To me, the goal of a beta is to find unknown bugs. If no new bugs are >> found during a beta release, then it can be automatically promoted to RC >> via re-tagging. Likewise, if no new bugs are found during a RC after X >> time, then it can be promoted to final. >> >> If we end up not releasing a final 5.0 artifact by a Cassandra Summit it >> will signal to the community that we’re prioritizing stability and it could >> be a good opportunity to get people to test the beta or RC before we stamp >> it as production ready. >> >> WDYT? >> >> > Aaron (and anybody who takes the time to follow this list, really), >> your opinion matters, that's why we discuss it here. >> >> +1, PMC are just officers who endorse community decisions, so if any >> contributor has an opinion which is not technically refuted it will usually >> be backed by a PMC via a binding -1 (as seen on this thread) >> >> On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 20:04 Nate McCall <zznat...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 3:28 AM Aleksey Yeshchenko <alek...@apple.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> -1 on cutting a beta1 in this state. An alpha2 would be acceptable now, >>>> but I’m not sure there is significant value to be had from it. Merge the >>>> fixes for outstanding issues listed above, then cut beta1. >>>> >>> <snip> >>> >>> Agree with Aleksey. -1 on a beta we know has issues with a top-line new >>> feature. >>> >>> >>> >>
