What is the status of this thread? Are we looking to move each driver
project to its own jira instance, as voted for in CEP-8?

Kind Regards,
Brandon

On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 9:29 AM Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am +1 on separate projects as well, but to Abe's point I don't think
> it matters now, we had 21 binding votes for CEP-8 which spells this
> out.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Brandon
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 9:24 AM Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1 to separate JIRA projects per subproject. Having workflows distinct to 
> > each project is reason enough for me, nevermind the global namespace 
> > pollution that occurs if you pack a bunch of disparate projects together 
> > into one instance.
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2024, at 9:11 PM, Dinesh Joshi wrote:
> >
> > hi folks - sorry to have dropped the ball on responding to this thread.
> >
> > My 2 cents are as follows -
> >
> > 1. Having a separate JIRA project for each sub-project will add management 
> > overhead. This option, however, allows us to model unique workflows for the 
> > sub-project.
> >
> > 2. Managing the sub-project as part of the Cassandra JIRA project would 
> > imply less management overhead but the sub-project would need to conform to 
> > the same workflows.
> >
> > I would pick option 1 unless there is a strong reason and desire to manage 
> > a separate Jira project. We can always split out the Java Driver project if 
> > things don't work out. OTOH merging a Jira project is harder.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Dinesh
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 12:45 PM Abe Ratnofsky <a...@aber.io> wrote:
> >
> > CEP-8 proposes using separate Jira projects per Cassandra sub-project:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-8%3A+DataStax+Drivers+Donation
> >
> > > We suggest distinct Jira projects, one per driver, all to be created.
> >
> > I don't see any discussion changing that from the [DISCUSS] or vote threads:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/01pljcncyjyo467l5orh8nf9okrh7oxm
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/opt630do09phh7hlt28odztxdv6g58dp
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/crolkrhd4y6tt3k4hsy204xomshlcp4p
> >
> > But looks like upon acceptance that was changed:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/dhov01s8dvvh3882oxhkmmfv4tqdd68o
> >
> > > New issues will be tracked under the CASSANDRA project on Apache’s JIRA 
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/CASSANDRA> under the component 
> > > ‘Client/java-driver’.
> >
> > I'm in favor of using the same Jira as Cassandra proper. Committership is 
> > project-wide, so having a standardized process (same ticket flow, review 
> > rules, labels, etc. is beneficial). But multiple votes happened based on 
> > the content of the CEP, so we should stick to what was voted on and move to 
> > a separate Jira.
> >
> > --
> > Abe
> >
> >

Reply via email to