The question is if we are signaling compatibility or purely marketing with the release number. We dropped compatibility with a few things in 5.0, which was the reason for the .0 rather than 4.2. I don’t know if we are breaking any compatibility with current trunk? Though maybe some of the TCM stuff could be considered that. If we are purely going for marketing value, then yes, I agree TCM+Accord would be 6.0 worthy.
-Jeremiah On Dec 10, 2024 at 10:48:21 AM, Jon Haddad <j...@rustyrazorblade.com> wrote: > Keeping this short. I'm not sure why we're calling the next release 5.1. > TCM and Accord are a massive thing. Other .1 / .2 releases were the .0 > with some smaller things added. Imo this is a huge step forward, as big as > 5.0 was, so we should call it 6.0. > > >
