> On 10 Mar 2026, at 15:31, Jeff Jirsa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> That said, we can do better than status quo - if you care enough to nominate
> a CEP and it passes a vote, I suggest you should be obligated to send a
> monthly/quarterly status update for as long as the CEP is open, and failure
> to do so implies the CEP is abandoned, and we mark it as such
Yes, this.
And the CEP is supposed to link to the jira ticket, and the jira ticket is
supposed to list the intended version. If work stops, or you see it won't be
landing in the next release, update the ticket accordingly.
We don't need to be duplicating admin work, or pressuring contributors to make
estimates they don't have control over and that won't be realistic… But we
can and should be breaking up the jira (epic) with smaller/sub tickets…
