Yes, I did. The test in question (TC98) does not really fail, afair. Yes, there's a stack trace, but as far as I can tell, the test completes successfully.
Werner Bruce Snyder wrote: > On 7/19/05, Ralf Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>as far as I remember I got that failure at TC97 once after setting up >>the test database. After executing: >> >>update poly_owner set product=1; >> >>on the mysql commandline client this problem disapeared and never >>returned. At that time I thought that this may be a problem with the >>mysql.sql script but after checking this right now I think there is >>something going wrong with unidirectional relations to polymorph classes >>as we have from owner to product. >> >>The stacktrace of TC98 looks ok to me as we try to load the same object >>in 2 independent threads which should lead to a Locking problems. >>Loading the objects in a single thread works as you can see when >>debuging through the other test cases. > > > I'm using MySQL 5.0.7-beta-max. After running the update statement and > rerunning TC97, the test then passes. But TC98 is still failing. Did > Werner write these tests? > > Bruce ------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty message to the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------
