Dave,

I'd find it hard to believe if this is on intention (though I might
stand corrected .. ;-)). Can you please open a new Jira issue at
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CASTOR based upon your findings, and
attach a unified patch (if that's an option for you).

Thanks for your help.
Werner

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> I was looking through the source for castor-0.9.9.1-xml.jar
> 
> I found 4 places in org.exolab.castor.xml.schema.Schema.java where  the
> following pattern exists
> 
> ...
> if ( result = false ) {
>    ...
> }
> ...
> 
> NOTE: The single equals(=) assignment operator instead on the
> comparsion(==) operator.
> 
> 
> 
> This line numbers to the 4 instances on the pattern are : 1815, 1840,
> 1897, 2002
> 
> Is this the intended behavior?
> 
> Thanks,
>        DaVe.
>        .-.
>       /v\
>      // \\
>     /(   )\
>    ^^-^^  
> LAMP Rules    David Buschman, SCJP
> Web Developer
> LEOPARD
> Marketing. Communications. In that order.
> http://www.leopard.com
> 303.527.5143 tel   303.530.3480 fax
> 
> 
> 
> 
>    
> 


-------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please 
send an empty message to the following address:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to