Hi Werner, Thanks for your comment on the patch. I've identified and classified test cases based on JAXB spec. Hoping that you could help me to add the patch in SVN and give me permission to commit code, so that I can work directly to repository.
Currently, the org.exolab.castor.xml.schema package and the org.castor.jaxb.reflection package are quite good and I could not find any problem with my targeted goals. Up to now, it is OK for me to work with these APIs. In the last couple of weeks, I have done: - Study Schema API/ JAXB reflection API - Create some codes for testing org.exolab.castor.xml.schema package - Study JAXB2 specification and identify/classify potential use cases/test cases of XML Schema generator. To progress the project, in the next two weeks, I continue writing test cases for schema package. In addition, I think that the best way for schema generator is start to write some unit tests. So that I will understand deeply JAXB specification and generator requirement. Therefore, I will create a test framework and some unit test cases for XML Schema generator at the same time writing test cases for schema package. In the following two weeks, I will focus on architecture and design aspects of the generator. I warmly welcome your feedback and comments. Regards, Bao, P/S: As request from Ben, I put cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Bao, > > just had a look at the patch attached > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CASTOR-2384 > > and I think that (incrementally) adding more and more test cases to the > 'schema' module as you progress through both assessing the current state > of things and the Jira specification definitely added value to the > project (and its code base). > > Having said that, can you please try to define your aims for the next > two weeks ? And maybe summarize (once or twice a week) what you have > been doing so far ? > > Specifically, have you found any restrictions on the 'schema' classes > that prevent us from meeting the goals as defined in the JAXB > specification ? > > In addition, I'd like you to watch a thread (to-be) on this mailing list > on a refactoring of the Class-/FieldInfo classes to allow for greater > modularity, pluggability and separation of concerns. > > Regards > Werner > -- Le Duc Bao
