Hi Bao, Le Duc Bao wrote: > Hi Werner, > > Thanks for your comment on the patch. I've identified and classified test > cases based on JAXB spec. Any chances of making that classification available, e.g. in our Wiki ?
> Hoping that you could help me to add the patch in > SVN ... Sure, no problem. > ...and give me permission to commit code, so that I can work directly to > repository. For the time being, this will not be an option. In other words, cummulative patches atatched to Jira issues is the way forward. > Currently, the org.exolab.castor.xml.schema package and the > org.castor.jaxb.reflection package are quite good and I could not find any > problem with my targeted goals. Up to now, it is OK for me to work with > these APIs. > > In the last couple of weeks, I have done: > - Study Schema API/ JAXB reflection API > - Create some codes for testing org.exolab.castor.xml.schema package Can I assume that there's more tests than those two attached to the existing Jira issue ? > - Study JAXB2 specification and identify/classify potential use cases/test > cases of XML Schema generator. > > To progress the project, in the next two weeks, I continue writing test > cases for schema package. Great. Can you please frequently attach SVN diffs to a new Jira issue ? The more we have in the public, the easier it will be for us (you, Joachim and I) to cross-check our expectations. > In addition, I think that the best way for schema > generator is start to write some unit tests. Same as above. > So that I will understand > deeply JAXB specification and generator requirement. Therefore, I will > create a test framework and some unit test cases for XML Schema generator at > the same time writing test cases for schema package. > > In the following two weeks, I will focus on architecture and design aspects > of the generator. Again, any thoughts that are worthwhile for us to look at, please add to the Wiki. > > I warmly welcome your feedback and comments. > > Regards, > Bao, > > P/S: As request from Ben, I put cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. > > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Hi Bao, >> >> just had a look at the patch attached >> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CASTOR-2384 >> >> and I think that (incrementally) adding more and more test cases to the >> 'schema' module as you progress through both assessing the current state >> of things and the Jira specification definitely added value to the >> project (and its code base). >> >> Having said that, can you please try to define your aims for the next >> two weeks ? And maybe summarize (once or twice a week) what you have >> been doing so far ? >> >> Specifically, have you found any restrictions on the 'schema' classes >> that prevent us from meeting the goals as defined in the JAXB >> specification ? >> >> In addition, I'd like you to watch a thread (to-be) on this mailing list >> on a refactoring of the Class-/FieldInfo classes to allow for greater >> modularity, pluggability and separation of concerns. >> >> Regards >> Werner >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
