Hello, please read inline...
2008/10/28 Ralf Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Joachim, > > I do not like the inflationary increase of modules we see at the moment. > Please keep in mind that our users have to add a new dependency for each of > our modules. either I check-in the pull parser as part of xml module or in a complete new project; having it as additional module makes no sense as we would still introduce the new dependencies > > Having said that the increasing number of dependecies to external jar's > isn't a good direction either but there doesn't seam to be much alternatives > for the pull parser. This is exactly my point and why I kicked off this thread... both choices aren't fine > > In which Java version is the StAX API included? JDK6 and JAXP 1.4 > StAX implementation should be required for tests only? yep > Is ANTLR needed at runtime or only during build? that was one point why you choose to take JavaCC - ANTLR requires a runtime library for the prototype - and as you hadn't had a decision at this point - we took ANTLR as it is easier to build a grammar with it > > As you may remember our discussion about parser generators during > implementation of pull parser. JavaCC, which will be used at JDO in the > future, is only required during build but not at runtime. > > IMHO we should already try to reduce number of modules and external > dependencies with future releases. I also think of throwing away features or > parts of code that get never used at this step. I'm currently thinking we should: * check it into xml module * transfer the grammar to JavaCC * introduce the StAX dependency Have fun Joachim > > Regards > Ralf > > > Joachim Grüneis schrieb: > > Hello, > > after adapting the existing pull purser patch I'm not 100% sure if we > should have it in the main source tree of Castor... > it requires StAX API's, StAX implementation and two ANTLR libraries > maybe - even that it is a very small piece of code - we should have it > in an own project? > > what is your opinion? > > Joachim > > 2008/10/23 Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi, > > any chances of committing yourself to a firm deadline? I would like to > ship 1.3 final any time soon, and I do not want to be waiting for weeks. > > Werner > > Joachim Grüneis wrote: > > > Hello, > > I plan to add it to the code base within the next days... > > Joachim > > 2008/10/22 Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi Joachim, > > what are your plans of committing the pull-parsing add-on that has been > developed as part of GSoC 2008 ? > > Werner > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > -- > > Syscon Ingenieurbüro für Meß- und Datentechnik GmbH > Ralf Joachim > Raiffeisenstraße 11 > 72127 Kusterdingen > Germany > > Tel. +49 7071 3690 52 > Mobil: +49 173 9630135 > Fax +49 7071 3690 98 > > Internet: www.syscon.eu > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sitz der Gesellschaft: D-72127 Kusterdingen > Registereintrag: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 382295 > Geschäftsleitung: Jens Joachim, Ralf Joachim > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
