Joachim Grüneis wrote: > Hello, > > as for another question of this topic... > > wouldn't it be good to have the StAX-SAX translation inside the xml module? I don't think this is teh right way forward. Castor XML uses SAX only for (un-)marshalling, and has its dependencies optimized for this purpose.
We are introducing a new (and OPTIONAL) module that enables pull parsing using STaX on top of it. Why force folks to have to 'import' the StaX-API dependency when all they want is to use SAX-absed (un)marshalling. > and the rest a new module... > I'm just a bit reluctant to still increase the numbers of modules > Castor consists of Why. It has so many benefits .... which I ma happy to enumerate agin, if required. > and besides the translation it would be only very few classes the > fragment mapper introduces... > the next patch will show this in more detail > > Joachim > > 2008/11/13 Joachim Grüneis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Hello, >> >> I'm currently converting the ANTLR stuff to JavaCC - to be exact I >> first searched for a ready JavaCC solution, which I didn't find, and >> now I rewrite the ANTLR grammer to JavaCC to reduce the dependencies >> and technologies we use... >> >> Joachim >> >> 2008/11/13 Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Joachim, >>> >>> any progress on your side ? An opinion ? An updated Maven POM ? Anything >>> ? I am sure you have read the mentor agreement you have signed with >>> Google, right ? >>> >>> Werner >>> >>> Joachim Grüneis wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> after adapting the existing pull purser patch I'm not 100% sure if we >>>> should have it in the main source tree of Castor... >>>> it requires StAX API's, StAX implementation and two ANTLR libraries >>>> maybe - even that it is a very small piece of code - we should have it >>>> in an own project? >>>> >>>> what is your opinion? >>>> >>>> Joachim >>>> >>>> 2008/10/23 Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> any chances of committing yourself to a firm deadline? I would like to >>>>> ship 1.3 final any time soon, and I do not want to be waiting for weeks. >>>>> >>>>> Werner >>>>> >>>>> Joachim Grüneis wrote: >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> I plan to add it to the code base within the next days... >>>>>> >>>>>> Joachim >>>>>> >>>>>> 2008/10/22 Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>>>>> Hi Joachim, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> what are your plans of committing the pull-parsing add-on that has been >>>>>>> developed as part of GSoC 2008 ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Werner >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>>>> >>>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>>> >>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>> >>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>> >>> >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email