Joachim Grüneis wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> as for another question of this topic...
> 
> wouldn't it be good to have the StAX-SAX translation inside the xml module?
I don't think this is teh right way forward. Castor XML uses SAX only
for (un-)marshalling, and has its dependencies optimized for this purpose.

We are introducing a new (and OPTIONAL) module that enables pull parsing
using STaX on top of it. Why force folks to have to 'import' the
StaX-API dependency when all they want is to use SAX-absed (un)marshalling.

> and the rest a new module...
> I'm just a bit reluctant to still increase the numbers of modules
> Castor consists of
Why. It has so many benefits ....  which I ma happy to enumerate agin,
if required.

> and besides the translation it would be only very few classes the
> fragment mapper introduces...
> the next patch will show this in more detail
> 
> Joachim
> 
> 2008/11/13 Joachim Grüneis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm currently converting the ANTLR stuff to JavaCC - to be exact I
>> first searched for a ready JavaCC solution, which I didn't find, and
>> now I rewrite the ANTLR grammer to JavaCC to reduce the dependencies
>> and technologies we use...
>>
>> Joachim
>>
>> 2008/11/13 Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Joachim,
>>>
>>> any progress on your side ? An opinion ? An updated Maven POM ? Anything
>>> ? I am sure you have read the mentor agreement you have signed with
>>> Google, right ?
>>>
>>> Werner
>>>
>>> Joachim Grüneis wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> after adapting the existing pull purser patch I'm not 100% sure if we
>>>> should have it in the main source tree of Castor...
>>>> it requires StAX API's, StAX implementation and two ANTLR libraries
>>>> maybe - even that it is a very small piece of code - we should have it
>>>> in an own project?
>>>>
>>>> what is your opinion?
>>>>
>>>> Joachim
>>>>
>>>> 2008/10/23 Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> any chances of committing yourself to a firm deadline? I would like to
>>>>> ship 1.3 final any time soon, and I do not want to be waiting for weeks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Werner
>>>>>
>>>>> Joachim Grüneis wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I plan to add it to the code base within the next days...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Joachim
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2008/10/22 Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>>>>> Hi Joachim,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> what are your plans of committing the pull-parsing add-on that has been
>>>>>>> developed as part of GSoC 2008 ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Werner
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>>
>>>>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>
>>>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>
>>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> 
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to