Hi Werner,

your suggestions sound good to me. Will try to integrate them in the
evening.

Ralf


Werner Guttmann schrieb:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> Werner Guttmann wrote:
>   
>> Hi
>>
>> Werner Guttmann wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi Ralf,
>>>
>>> Ralf Joachim wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Hi Werner,
>>>>
>>>> at the weekend I configured Castor to also generate classes from
>>>> jdo-conf.xsd and cpactf-conf.xsd. Unfortunately the classes for
>>>> cpyctf-conf.xsd do not get generated when calling 'mvn install' on root
>>>> pom, instead you have to call 'mvn install' on cpactf pom. May it be
>>>> possible for you to take a look at this as I think you will know what to
>>>> do where I would need to search for the solution.
>>>>         
>>> Will do. Will be back in a second.
>>>       
>> The answer is quite simple. The cpactf module is not yet configured as a
>> module in the root POM. Simply add a
>>
>> <module>cpactf</module>
>>
>> section to the <modules> section of the root POM, and you'll get the
>> desired behaviour. I am currently testing whether this affects the build
>> somehow ....
>>     
> Actually, it does, as it will start to execute all JUnit tests to be
> found in src/test/java (which is what we intend when you run things
> manually). Problem is that this will cause issues, as e.g. our continous
> integration won't have a database available, etc. This won't be solvable
> within a day or two, as we need to do a few things (e.g. use an embedded
>  database by default, ...).
>
> As such, here's a suggestion (which I have just tried myself): skip the
> tests by configuring the <skipTests> property in the
> <maven-surefire-plugin> of the cpactf module for the time being. This
> will allow us some aditional time to ponder how to go about this. Is
> this fine with you ?
>
> Werner
>   
>> If you add that <module> statement to the root POM, though, we should
>> ask ourselves whether we want to deploy the CPACTF JAR in a Maven
>> repository. Personally, I think there's no need to to do. Correct ?
>>
>> Werner
>>
>>     
>>>> If you think we should remove ant scripts and lib directory before 1.3GA
>>>> I will work on it in the afternoon. Let me know if you like that for
>>>> 1.3GA or 1.3.1.
>>>>         
>>> 1.3.1 is fine with me. No need to rush things. In other words, release
>>> notes should do it.
>>>
>>>       
>>>> For the Configuration change (Properties) I'll add something top release
>>>> notes.
>>>>         
>>> +1. I hope that no other tool such as e.g. the Maven plugin makes use of
>>> those (by now) deleted *Configuration classes.
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Regards
>>>> Ralf
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>
>>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
>>     
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>   


-- 

Syscon Ingenieurbüro für Meß- und Datentechnik GmbH
Ralf Joachim
Raiffeisenstraße 11
72127 Kusterdingen
Germany

Tel.   +49 7071 3690 52
Mobil: +49 173 9630135
Fax    +49 7071 3690 98

Internet: www.syscon.eu
E-Mail: ralf.joac...@syscon.eu

Sitz der Gesellschaft: D-72127 Kusterdingen
Registereintrag: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 382295
Geschäftsleitung: Jens Joachim, Ralf Joachim

Reply via email to