Ralf, mind if I check this in, as I have got things ready already ?
Werner Ralf Joachim wrote: > Hi Werner, > > your suggestions sound good to me. Will try to integrate them in the > evening. > > Ralf > > > Werner Guttmann schrieb: >> Hi Ralf, >> >> Werner Guttmann wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> Werner Guttmann wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Ralf, >>>> >>>> Ralf Joachim wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Werner, >>>>> >>>>> at the weekend I configured Castor to also generate classes from >>>>> jdo-conf.xsd and cpactf-conf.xsd. Unfortunately the classes for >>>>> cpyctf-conf.xsd do not get generated when calling 'mvn install' on root >>>>> pom, instead you have to call 'mvn install' on cpactf pom. May it be >>>>> possible for you to take a look at this as I think you will know what to >>>>> do where I would need to search for the solution. >>>>> >>>> Will do. Will be back in a second. >>>> >>> The answer is quite simple. The cpactf module is not yet configured as a >>> module in the root POM. Simply add a >>> >>> <module>cpactf</module> >>> >>> section to the <modules> section of the root POM, and you'll get the >>> desired behaviour. I am currently testing whether this affects the build >>> somehow .... >>> >> Actually, it does, as it will start to execute all JUnit tests to be >> found in src/test/java (which is what we intend when you run things >> manually). Problem is that this will cause issues, as e.g. our continous >> integration won't have a database available, etc. This won't be solvable >> within a day or two, as we need to do a few things (e.g. use an embedded >> database by default, ...). >> >> As such, here's a suggestion (which I have just tried myself): skip the >> tests by configuring the <skipTests> property in the >> <maven-surefire-plugin> of the cpactf module for the time being. This >> will allow us some aditional time to ponder how to go about this. Is >> this fine with you ? >> >> Werner >> >>> If you add that <module> statement to the root POM, though, we should >>> ask ourselves whether we want to deploy the CPACTF JAR in a Maven >>> repository. Personally, I think there's no need to to do. Correct ? >>> >>> Werner >>> >>> >>>>> If you think we should remove ant scripts and lib directory before 1.3GA >>>>> I will work on it in the afternoon. Let me know if you like that for >>>>> 1.3GA or 1.3.1. >>>>> >>>> 1.3.1 is fine with me. No need to rush things. In other words, release >>>> notes should do it. >>>> >>>> >>>>> For the Configuration change (Properties) I'll add something top release >>>>> notes. >>>>> >>>> +1. I hope that no other tool such as e.g. the Maven plugin makes use of >>>> those (by now) deleted *Configuration classes. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Ralf >>>>> >>>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>>> >>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>> >>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
