I've been too busy (work and personal) to check out the release artifacts, which is why I haven't chimed in. I *could* just add an obligatory +1, but that doesn't feel right and I was hoping others had more time to do abetter checkout. The only thing I noticed when I took a very quick cursory look is that the 1.2.3 release Tore put together doesn't have checksum files, but I consider this a non-issue.
Thanks, /dev/mrg On 5/10/07, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Talking of which - we need one more vote from a PMC member. Any of the remaining members have time to check the release and vote? Andrus On May 10, 2007, at 6:29 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > IMO you are correct - only PMC member votes are binding. But there > are two things to note in this respect: (1) input from committers > is always taken into account - I don't think there's been instances > when we ignored such input on matters requiring a vote; (2) PMC is > not some elite caste - IMO we should expand/contract it as needed > to include people who contribute to the project and to the > community. And in fact I am planning to act on item (2). > > Andrus > > > On May 10, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Kevin Menard wrote: >> Hmm . . . I just reviewed the voting procedure and noticed that >> technically my +1 is non-binding. Do we make the distinction between >> PMC members and committers for project releases? >> >> -- >> Kevin >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Kevin Menard >>> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 12:32 PM >>> To: '[email protected]' >>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Cayenne 1.2.3 and 2.0.3 >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> FYI, I was involved in the release process and tested 2.0.3 >>> against HSQLDB, Derby, PostgreSQL 8.2, and MySQL 5. All >>> worked for me. >>> >>> -- >>> Kevin >> > >
