The vote should be open at least 72 hours, but it can be open as long as necessary.
I will try to find time to look at the release tonight, but I have a lot of non-computer-related issues to deal with at this time. On 5/10/07, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the response. My concern certainly wasn't either points 1 or 2 that you addressed. The bigger issue is that in about an hour the vote will have been open for 72 hours and as of now there have only been two binding votes cast; three are necessary for the vote to pass . . . -- Kevin > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 11:29 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Binding votes (WAS: [VOTE] Release Cayenne 1.2.3 > and 2.0.3) > > IMO you are correct - only PMC member votes are binding. But > there are two things to note in this respect: (1) input from > committers is always taken into account - I don't think > there's been instances when we ignored such input on matters > requiring a vote; (2) PMC is not some elite caste - IMO we > should expand/contract it as needed to include people who > contribute to the project and to the community. > And in fact I am planning to act on item (2). > > Andrus > > > On May 10, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Kevin Menard wrote: > > Hmm . . . I just reviewed the voting procedure and noticed that > > technically my +1 is non-binding. Do we make the > distinction between > > PMC members and committers for project releases? > > > > -- > > Kevin > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Kevin Menard > >> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 12:32 PM > >> To: '[email protected]' > >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Cayenne 1.2.3 and 2.0.3 > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> FYI, I was involved in the release process and tested > 2.0.3 against > >> HSQLDB, Derby, PostgreSQL 8.2, and MySQL 5. All worked for me. > >> > >> -- > >> Kevin > > > >
