The back-port classes don't use the new Java byte-codes that were added in Java 5 so there still is some performance improvement in Java 5. But if the alternative is to require Java 5, some users might want to take a bit lower performance instead.
Craig On Aug 6, 2007, at 8:19 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
On Aug 5, 2007, at 5:39 AM, Kevin Menard wrote:the new concurrent API could yield significant speed improvements.Being all backwards compatible, I haven't played much with that, but I suspect that things like ConcurrentHashMap should help us to improve throughput of DataRowStore and EventManager. So I am softening my stand against 3.0 switch to Java 5 :-)Maybe a poll on the user list is a good idea? Andrus
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
