http://g.oswego.edu/dl/classes/EDU/oswego/cs/dl/util/concurrent/intro.html
On 8/6/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't have details in front of me, but I understand that many of > the popular Concurrent classes have been back-ported to Java 1.4. If > you like, I can get more details if you can't find it on the Internet. > > The back-port classes don't use the new Java byte-codes that were > added in Java 5 so there still is some performance improvement in > Java 5. But if the alternative is to require Java 5, some users might > want to take a bit lower performance instead. > > Craig > > On Aug 6, 2007, at 8:19 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > > > > On Aug 5, 2007, at 5:39 AM, Kevin Menard wrote: > > > >> the new concurrent API could yield significant speed improvements. > > > > Being all backwards compatible, I haven't played much with that, > > but I suspect that things like ConcurrentHashMap should help us to > > improve throughput of DataRowStore and EventManager. So I am > > softening my stand against 3.0 switch to Java 5 :-) > > > > Maybe a poll on the user list is a good idea? > > > > Andrus > > > > > > > > Craig Russell > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > >
