On Oct 20, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
We've gone back and forth on this a few times now. As long as the
conversation is still productive, I don't mind following it.
Unfortunately,
I don't have as great an understanding of the internals as you do,
so if
we're just rehashing old ground, we can agree to disagree. What
I'd just
hate to see is if we continue to do things the way we have been out
of force
of habit, rather than because it's the best way to do it. I see a
lot of
room for improvement and based on graph theory, can see how it
could be
solved. I haven't ascertained from the Cayenne code how disruptive
a change
it would be, however.
Yes, there seems to be a difference in approach to managing object
graphs... I feel like I do not understand many of your examples
simply cause I've been doing things differently, so I never thought
that certain things are actually problematic.
So I suspect that there is still misunderstanding on my end as to why
you are suggesting some of these changes. Can somebody else following
this discussion maybe point out what I am missing when defending the
existing design?
Andrus
