On 10/21/07 4:20 PM, "Lachlan Deck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If this is something you'd prefer to do, Kevin, then I'd suggest > adjusting your velocity templates to achieve what you'd like for the > varying setter methods and so on. This is the usual place to do any > such abstractions. Certainly, that's doable. As is what Ari had suggested. The question is should there be a better "default". If it is common practice for end users to roll similar abstractions, that seems to be indicative of there needing to be a better default. Unfortunately, that's a difficult thing to ascertain. -- Kevin
