1. Dead issues. Good catch. I closed CAY-1036 and CAY-708. Let me know if you think some other issues are also obsolete.

2. Confluence. I also added you to the Confluence "cayenne-users" and "cayenne-admins" groups. You may have noticed that we have a few Confluence spaces for different purposes, most notably:

CAY - a wiki
CAYDOC - a documentation exported to SVN and bundled with the release
CAYSITE - a CMS replacement for the live site editing.

Both CAYDOC and CAYSITE are automatically rsynced with cayenne.apache.org.

3. Jira notifications. I just redirected all of them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Andrus


On Nov 8, 2008, at 8:52 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:

I've seen some obviously obsolete and dead issues in Jira, like CAY-1036 or CAY-708. It'll be great to clean out those issues and assign among us bunch
of the most important opened ones.
As of the versions, detail version number is great.

About M5, I'm still not sure what should we do with CAY-1077. Switching between single and double click is a minute work and I'd prefer we close it
and release M5 as fast as possible.

About Confluence, could someone give me permission rights to edit pages?
Username is "andrey".

2008/11/8, Aristedes Maniatis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


On 08/11/2008, at 11:08 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

On Nov 8, 2008, at 2:32 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:

1. Should we point Jira emails to the svn list instead just like
Confluence emails? I think that is better since it doesn't create so much noise. I don't want to discourage potential contributors from subscribing to
this list. If so, I can't see where this setting lives in Jira.


+0. Either list is fine with me. It should be under "notification schemes"


I'm not seeing that. Perhaps an access rights thing. Personally, I'd love to get them onto the svn list so that it is easier to track conversations.


3. I'll go through and assign all the M5 tasks which have been done and the
ones I know are being worked on. If I feel like a mind-numbing task one night I'll do a few more earlier milestones as well. Any objections to this
approach?


+1. A comments on the details: From experience using Jira as a release management tool on a commercial project, I'd suggest setting "Fix version" to the target milestone. Among other things this allows auto- generation of the release notes. "Affects Version/s" on the other hand should be the version <= "fix version" or null. For bugs, affected version is usually a version where a bug was discovered. For the new features it is more vague,
and may even be left empty.


Yes, that's what I've done so far. So we get something like this:


https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10000&styleName=Html&version=10120

We'll convert our release notes file to html I guess. We can even try again to do that thing with embedding Jira blocks inside Confluence although last
time we tried that had some problems with the export plugin we use at
Apache.

Ari





-------------------------->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001   fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A




Reply via email to