While Cayenne will traverse that path, it's unnecessary. I think allowing such mapping introduces more confusion than anything else and such mapped relationships are normally an error than anything else. As such, I proposed not allowing the relationship path dialog to grow unbounded with such loops.
NB: this does not affect the general case of relationship mapping. -- Kevin On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm... not that I ever mapped a flattened relationship like that myself, but > technically this is totally valid: > > ObjRelationship: Painting.peerPaintings > > mapped as > > DbRelationship Path: PAINTING.toArtist.paintings > > Andrus > > > On Nov 18, 2008, at 3:49 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote: > >> A -> B -> A is culled (B -> A will not be shown) when relationships are >> reverse to each other & A -> B is to-one (e.g. paintings -> Artist -> >> paintings) >> >> 2008/11/18, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>> >>> On Nov 18, 2008, at 3:33 PM, Kevin Menard wrote: >>> >>> I only was able to play with culling briefly, but it >>>> >>>> looks to be cutting down my choices considerably, which is good. >>>> >>> >>> BTW, what's this about? Looks like I missed something. >>> >>> Andrus >>> >>> > >
