Cool. If that's what culling is currently about, then I am +1.
So please treat the email that I sent on greying things out as an
optional nice-to-have feature suggestion for the future releases.
Andrus
On Nov 18, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
You're right, B->A must be to-one, not A->B.
ARTIST.paintings.artist is the same object.
2008/11/18, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hmm... not that I ever mapped a flattened relationship like that
myself,
but technically this is totally valid:
ObjRelationship: Painting.peerPaintings
mapped as
DbRelationship Path: PAINTING.toArtist.paintings
Andrus
On Nov 18, 2008, at 3:49 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
A -> B -> A is culled (B -> A will not be shown) when relationships
are
reverse to each other & A -> B is to-one (e.g. paintings -> Artist
->
paintings)
2008/11/18, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Nov 18, 2008, at 3:33 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
I only was able to play with culling briefly, but it
looks to be cutting down my choices considerably, which is good.
BTW, what's this about? Looks like I missed something.
Andrus
