On 06/04/2009, at 5:55 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Since we are not shipping JPA with 3.0, and further future of this line of development is undefined, we need to make some decisions now. I suggest doing what we did for DataViews - a separate location in SVN, and a separate wiki space. If this effort is revived (of which I have very strong doubts), we'll get it back to the main subtree.
What is the downside of just leaving it as is? The framework is nicely separated as a separate maven/eclipse project, and moving the documentation to be a second class citizen will only discourage anyone else from working on it.
As it is, there is perhaps more chance of someone finding it interesting and working on it, although the hurdles of signing the NDA, etc make that less likely.
Ari --------------------------> ish http://www.ish.com.au Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001 GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
