Andrey Razumovsky commented on CAY-400:
---------------------------------------
Well, I think I could work on this one, but my choice is SQL
comments in DBobjects, not exactly the idea Andrus originally
proposed. Any objections?
I have no problem with the reduced scope. But can we still make it a
generic property map initialized lazily and attached to DbAtrtribute
or DbEntity, with comments being just one of the possible fields in
it? I.e. the idea to group any properties not relevant to Cayenne
runtime functioning in an untyped Map<String, Object>, instead of
declaring them as ivars.
Andrus
