On 14/04/2009, at 6:13 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
I have no problem with the reduced scope. But can we still make it a generic property map initialized lazily and attached to DbAtrtribute or DbEntity, with comments being just one of the possible fields in it? I.e. the idea to group any properties not relevant to Cayenne runtime functioning in an untyped Map<String, Object>, instead of declaring them as ivars
Map<String, String> might be easier unless we want to go to the trouble of typing these objects in both Cayenne modeler with another popup option and also in the XML. Mostly the user can cast them into some other data type if needed.
Ari --------------------------> ish http://www.ish.com.au Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001 GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
