On Sep 23, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
#1: Call the enum class Order. I think Order.ASCENDING would be readable and intuitive.
+1
#2: Keep it something more descriptive like OrderingDirection, but in the Ordering class have a "public static final OrderingDirection ASCENDING = OrderingDirection.ASCENDING;". Then you could reference Ordering.ASCENDING (kind of like Ordering.ASC). This seems awkward, though, but makes it similar to what is already there.
Don't understand this one. Why the new Order enum is not sufficient? Andrus
