I was favoring #1. #2 was just a thought to keep it similar to what already exists in the Ordering class, but didn't seem as good to me.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Michael Gentry wrote: > >> #1: Call the enum class Order. I think Order.ASCENDING would be >> readable and intuitive. > > +1 > >> >> #2: Keep it something more descriptive like OrderingDirection, but in >> the Ordering class have a "public static final OrderingDirection >> ASCENDING = OrderingDirection.ASCENDING;". Then you could reference >> Ordering.ASCENDING (kind of like Ordering.ASC). This seems awkward, >> though, but makes it similar to what is already there. > > Don't understand this one. Why the new Order enum is not sufficient? > > Andrus > >
