On Feb 10, 2010, at 11:20 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
I'd caution that the change is going to break things for existing users. I left the patch as is for peer review and then users reported on the list that it worked in their scenarios. Reverting that is undoubtedly going to break code they already have working and it's going to do so in an RC. So it seems to me like we're just trading off solving one problem for another.
If we correctly identified the scenario, the fix for the users would be to map their relationships correctly. I was going to add a note to the docs to that extent.
Andrus
