On Feb 9, 2010, at 2:11 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
I've reverted CAY-1009 and reproduced problem in one of my projects. It's exactly as in Kevin's scenario. Correcting my case, there's relationshipbetween B and C, not A and C.
I'll try to take a look at it tonight.
Could you upload your patch in svn format? I'm afraid I don't have git
AFAIK it should still be compatible with patch command and hopefully Eclipse (??). It has some extra headers that are simply ignored when patching.
Andrus
