> Does this need an extra class? (I'm asking because the proposals above look
> like class names, but I'm not sure whether that's intentional or accidental.)
No separate class. This is a String. So this is more about the "concept name"
used in various methods ("getUuid") and helper classes "UuidCoder".
Andrus
On Nov 3, 2011, at 1:03 PM, Durchholz, Joachim wrote:
> Just my 2 brainstorming cents:
>
>> Folks, any suggestions for a short and clear term for what is a String
>> representation of ObjectId?
>>
>> StringId
>> SerializedId
>> StringObjectId
>
> Does this need an extra class? (I'm asking because the proposals above look
> like class names, but I'm not sure whether that's intentional or accidental.)
> If not, I'd simply use String and refer to it as "ObjectId in String form"
> (or, if the context makes it clear, just as "Object Id").
> If yes, a look at that class or just its contracts might reveal more
> semantics that would allow us to come up with something.
>
> Regards,
> Jo
>
