> No separate class. This is a String. So this is more about the "concept name"
> used in various methods ("getUuid") and helper classes "UuidCoder".
In that case, my proposal is indeed this one:
> I'd [...] refer to it as "ObjectId in String form" (or, if the context makes
> it clear, just as "Object Id").
Possibly as "serialized ObjectId" if that String form is intended for
serialization.
I wouldn't create new terminology just for naming different representations of
the same semantics.
Just my 5 cents :-)
Regards,
Jo
