> but I'm not sure if we also have to change something in our maven build > process or upgrade some plugin.
Me neither. Probably some research is in order. Should we take this to a separate thread? Andrus On Jul 9, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <a...@maniatis.org> wrote: > Did we change the javadoc build process to avoid the javadoc security flaw > recently discovered? I patched the website javadocs, but I'm not sure if we > also have to change something in our maven build process or upgrade some > plugin. > > Ari > > > On 8/07/13 3:31am, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >> A new set of artifacts with no Rat failures is here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.2M1_2/ >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-112/ >> >> Please cast your votes. >> >> Andrus >> > > -- > --------------------------> > Aristedes Maniatis > GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A >
