Guys, Can I recommend you ask infra to create you guys an
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cayenne/ and https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cayenne/ It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you must commit your approved release to the above release area. Can I also suggest from now on you use the above dist /dev/ area for where you put your RC candidates for voting on (instead of using people.a.o) . Once approved, you can simply svn mv it from dev to release area and the mirrors will pick it up. Thanks Gav... > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:and...@objectstyle.org] > Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2013 4:13 PM > To: dev@cayenne.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3.2M1 - take 2 > > > but I'm not sure if we also have to change something in our maven build > process or upgrade some plugin. > > Me neither. Probably some research is in order. Should we take this to a > separate thread? > > Andrus > > On Jul 9, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <a...@maniatis.org> wrote: > > > Did we change the javadoc build process to avoid the javadoc security flaw > recently discovered? I patched the website javadocs, but I'm not sure if we > also have to change something in our maven build process or upgrade some > plugin. > > > > Ari > > > > > > On 8/07/13 3:31am, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > >> A new set of artifacts with no Rat failures is here: > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.2M1_2/ > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne- > 112/ > >> > >> Please cast your votes. > >> > >> Andrus > >> > > > > -- > > --------------------------> > > Aristedes Maniatis > > GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A > >
