Yep, and a +1 from me.

Ari


On 15/07/13 11:28pm, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
Oops.   Just realized I never cast my vote.

Source provided: check
checksums match: check
signatures match: check
Source builds: check
appropriately licensed: checked by rat

+1


On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> wrote:
OK, a +1 from me (I'm assuming my Mac is just having a Java glitch).

BTW, I built Cayenne Modeler from the source download using Java 6 and
7 and both ran fine.  It is just the DMG version that trolls me.

Thanks,

mrg


On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
PS. I can just skip the OS X stuff and do the rest of the evaluation.

Probably at this point this is the best option :-/

On Jul 15, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> wrote:

[07:47:10] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> /usr/libexec/java_home -V
Matching Java Virtual Machines (4):
    1.7.0_25, x86_64: "Java SE 7"
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
    1.7.0_07, x86_64: "Java SE 7"
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_07.jdk/Contents/Home
    1.6.0_51-b11-456, x86_64: "Java SE 6"
/System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
    1.6.0_51-b11-456, i386: "Java SE 6"
/System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home

/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home

[07:47:22] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> /usr/libexec/java_home
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home

Cayenne Modeler *does* run, just not the one distributed in the DMG.
I built CM from the source distribution using "/usr/bin/mvn clean
install -Passembly,mac" and it runs fine, so I don't think it is an
issue with choosing the Java version.

mrg

PS. I can just skip the OS X stuff and do the rest of the evaluation.


On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
BTW, Mike, do you have both Java 6 & 7, or just 7? E.g. here is what I have on 
my machine:

~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.7
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home

~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.6
/System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home

~: java -version
java version "1.7.0_25"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)

(and the Modeler somehow still picks Java 6)

Andrus

On Jul 14, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> wrote:

I suspect OS X already cached some information associated with this particular 
download on your machine.

Not sure how we get out of a bind with the release vote here? Maybe you take the release 
"src" assembly (which is from the ASF perspective is the only thing that 
matters in a release; of course the end users may have a different opinion :)), build an 
OS X assembly from it locally, and test the Modeler based on your build? Not ideal, bit 
without having a clue as to the nature of the Modeler failures not sure what else we can 
do.

Andrus


On Jul 14, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> wrote:
I've rebooted, downloaded using different browsers, and tried Ari's
trick of docking the modeler/etc, but still no luck running it from
the distribution copy (the one I built locally runs).  I suppose it
could just be my system and if so, I'll be neutral on the release.  My
system is up-to-date:

[11:05:18] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> java -version
java version "1.7.0_25"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)

And I'm on 10.8.4, just like Andrus.

mrg

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <a...@maniatis.org> wrote:
Yes, I see the same random behaviour with another of my projects. Only on
OSX and there is no discernable pattern. A workstation will fail in just
that way. But then you can drag the app to the Dock and run it from there
just fine. After you do that, the original app might then be double
clickable again.

I am pretty sure this is just a runtime OSX/Java oddity and nothing to do
with the build itself being broken. We have seen it happen less often since
our machines moved to Java 7.



Ari



On 14/07/13 1:48am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

I recall one of my colleagues ran into a similar unexplainable behavior
with a newly downloaded Modeler about a year ago. That was a version of
Cayenne that was current back then. We went through a bunch of random
motions - reboots, re-downloads, and eventually it worked. Also couldn't
figure out the cause… I attribute it to some OS X bug.

Andrus

On Jul 13, 2013, at 6:13 PM, John Huss <johnth...@gmail.com> wrote:

Both worked for me as well.

On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

This is very odd. I just downloaded a fresh copy via FireFox, and it
opens
just fine on my laptop (after expected warnings about opening downloaded
software for the first time). Also both from mounted image and from
Desktop. I have OS X 10.8.4.

Andrus

On Jul 13, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Michael Gentry
<mgen...@masslight.net<javascript:;>>
wrote:

FWIW, I just built the OS X assembly and it runs fine (HD and DMG),
but the downloaded version didn't for some reason.


On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry
<mgen...@masslight.net<javascript:;>>

wrote:

-1

MD5 for OS X DMG is correct, but Cayenne Modeler fails to launch from
both the mounted disk image and the HD (copied from the disk image)
with the following alert:

“CayenneModeler.app” is damaged and can’t be opened. You should move
it to the Trash.
Safari downloaded this file today at 9:37 AM from people.apache.org.

The console didn't provide anything useful when canceling the alert:

7/13/13 9:50:23.601 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[342]:
([0x0-0x35c35c].CayenneModeler[6610]) Exited: Killed: 9

I'm on Mountain Lion with the latest Java release.

mrg


On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis
<a...@maniatis.org<javascript:;>>

wrote:

On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote:


It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors you

must

commit
your approved release to the above release area.



https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537

Thanks
Ari


--
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A






--
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A







--
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Reply via email to