I did the same tests as Mike, plus compared the built JARs vs the distributed JARs, and tested the modeler a bit.
Thanks, mrg On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oops. Just realized I never cast my vote. > > Source provided: check > checksums match: check > signatures match: check > Source builds: check > appropriately licensed: checked by rat > > +1 > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> wrote: >> OK, a +1 from me (I'm assuming my Mac is just having a Java glitch). >> >> BTW, I built Cayenne Modeler from the source download using Java 6 and >> 7 and both ran fine. It is just the DMG version that trolls me. >> >> Thanks, >> >> mrg >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> >> wrote: >>>> PS. I can just skip the OS X stuff and do the rest of the evaluation. >>> >>> Probably at this point this is the best option :-/ >>> >>> On Jul 15, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> wrote: >>> >>>> [07:47:10] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> /usr/libexec/java_home -V >>>> Matching Java Virtual Machines (4): >>>> 1.7.0_25, x86_64: "Java SE 7" >>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home >>>> 1.7.0_07, x86_64: "Java SE 7" >>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_07.jdk/Contents/Home >>>> 1.6.0_51-b11-456, x86_64: "Java SE 6" >>>> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home >>>> 1.6.0_51-b11-456, i386: "Java SE 6" >>>> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home >>>> >>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home >>>> >>>> [07:47:22] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> /usr/libexec/java_home >>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home >>>> >>>> Cayenne Modeler *does* run, just not the one distributed in the DMG. >>>> I built CM from the source distribution using "/usr/bin/mvn clean >>>> install -Passembly,mac" and it runs fine, so I don't think it is an >>>> issue with choosing the Java version. >>>> >>>> mrg >>>> >>>> PS. I can just skip the OS X stuff and do the rest of the evaluation. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> >>>> wrote: >>>>> BTW, Mike, do you have both Java 6 & 7, or just 7? E.g. here is what I >>>>> have on my machine: >>>>> >>>>> ~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.7 >>>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home >>>>> >>>>> ~: /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.6 >>>>> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home >>>>> >>>>> ~: java -version >>>>> java version "1.7.0_25" >>>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15) >>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode) >>>>> >>>>> (and the Modeler somehow still picks Java 6) >>>>> >>>>> Andrus >>>>> >>>>> On Jul 14, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I suspect OS X already cached some information associated with this >>>>>> particular download on your machine. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not sure how we get out of a bind with the release vote here? Maybe you >>>>>> take the release "src" assembly (which is from the ASF perspective is >>>>>> the only thing that matters in a release; of course the end users may >>>>>> have a different opinion :)), build an OS X assembly from it locally, >>>>>> and test the Modeler based on your build? Not ideal, bit without having >>>>>> a clue as to the nature of the Modeler failures not sure what else we >>>>>> can do. >>>>>> >>>>>> Andrus >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jul 14, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> I've rebooted, downloaded using different browsers, and tried Ari's >>>>>>> trick of docking the modeler/etc, but still no luck running it from >>>>>>> the distribution copy (the one I built locally runs). I suppose it >>>>>>> could just be my system and if so, I'll be neutral on the release. My >>>>>>> system is up-to-date: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [11:05:18] ~/Projects/Eclipse/3.2-Release> java -version >>>>>>> java version "1.7.0_25" >>>>>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15) >>>>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And I'm on 10.8.4, just like Andrus. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> mrg >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <a...@maniatis.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Yes, I see the same random behaviour with another of my projects. Only >>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>> OSX and there is no discernable pattern. A workstation will fail in >>>>>>>> just >>>>>>>> that way. But then you can drag the app to the Dock and run it from >>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>> just fine. After you do that, the original app might then be double >>>>>>>> clickable again. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am pretty sure this is just a runtime OSX/Java oddity and nothing to >>>>>>>> do >>>>>>>> with the build itself being broken. We have seen it happen less often >>>>>>>> since >>>>>>>> our machines moved to Java 7. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ari >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 14/07/13 1:48am, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I recall one of my colleagues ran into a similar unexplainable >>>>>>>>> behavior >>>>>>>>> with a newly downloaded Modeler about a year ago. That was a version >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> Cayenne that was current back then. We went through a bunch of random >>>>>>>>> motions - reboots, re-downloads, and eventually it worked. Also >>>>>>>>> couldn't >>>>>>>>> figure out the cause… I attribute it to some OS X bug. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Andrus >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 6:13 PM, John Huss <johnth...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Both worked for me as well. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This is very odd. I just downloaded a fresh copy via FireFox, and it >>>>>>>>>>> opens >>>>>>>>>>> just fine on my laptop (after expected warnings about opening >>>>>>>>>>> downloaded >>>>>>>>>>> software for the first time). Also both from mounted image and from >>>>>>>>>>> Desktop. I have OS X 10.8.4. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Andrus >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 13, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Michael Gentry >>>>>>>>>>> <mgen...@masslight.net<javascript:;>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> FWIW, I just built the OS X assembly and it runs fine (HD and DMG), >>>>>>>>>>>> but the downloaded version didn't for some reason. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry >>>>>>>>>>>> <mgen...@masslight.net<javascript:;>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> MD5 for OS X DMG is correct, but Cayenne Modeler fails to launch >>>>>>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>>>> both the mounted disk image and the HD (copied from the disk >>>>>>>>>>>>> image) >>>>>>>>>>>>> with the following alert: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> “CayenneModeler.app” is damaged and can’t be opened. You should >>>>>>>>>>>>> move >>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the Trash. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Safari downloaded this file today at 9:37 AM from >>>>>>>>>>>>> people.apache.org. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The console didn't provide anything useful when canceling the >>>>>>>>>>>>> alert: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 7/13/13 9:50:23.601 AM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[342]: >>>>>>>>>>>>> ([0x0-0x35c35c].CayenneModeler[6610]) Exited: Killed: 9 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm on Mountain Lion with the latest Java release. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mrg >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Aristedes Maniatis >>>>>>>>>>>>> <a...@maniatis.org<javascript:;>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/07/13 9:04am, Gavin McDonald wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is now non optional and for your release to hit the mirrors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> must >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your approved release to the above release area. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6537 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ari >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis >>>>>>>>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 102A >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> --------------------------> >>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis >>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>
