On 21/01/2016 11:39pm, Dzmitry Kazimirchyk wrote: > One of the questions here is still whether we want to go all the way and > introduce changes which can potentially brake things for upgrading users or > we should preserve the old HessianROPServlet and the logic around it and have > a new pluggable approach as an alternative to what we currently have.
I don't think preserving backward compatibility is important here. Firstly, the number of ROP users is small. Secondly, the changes which this requires in end-user code are fairly simple and can be well documented. And this is targeting Cayenne 4.0, so a perfect time to break things if we need to. Ari -- --------------------------> Aristedes Maniatis GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
