Code itself is small and easy to maintain, as it doesn't do much. We just don't have a proper test suit for it and I'm sure not all Cayenne modules are compatible with OSGI, at least we have some non-unque packages (partially this would be resolved once we drop bunch of deprecated modules), If we keep it as is, is not much of a problem, I just don't like those parts with unknown state.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:02 PM Andrus Adamchik <aadamc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 5, 2022, at 2:00 PM, Nikita Timofeev <ntimof...@objectstyle.com> > > wrote: > > > > Id like to add OSGi support to that removal list as well. > > OSGi support was developed in response to a user request (should be somewhere > in the mailing list archives). I have no idea if anyone is still using it, > and I am generally unclear on the state of OSGi these days. So how hard is it > to keep it around? > > Andrus -- Best regards, Nikita Timofeev
