I agree. Though I suggest to keep it in the current untested mode for another cycle. Let's officially deprecate it in 5.0 and see if we get any feedback.
Andrus > On Jul 7, 2022, at 2:46 PM, Nikita Timofeev <ntimof...@objectstyle.com> wrote: > > Code itself is small and easy to maintain, as it doesn't do much. We > just don't have a proper test suit for it and I'm sure not all Cayenne > modules are compatible with OSGI, at least we have some non-unque > packages (partially this would be resolved once we drop bunch of > deprecated modules), > If we keep it as is, is not much of a problem, I just don't like those > parts with unknown state. > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:02 PM Andrus Adamchik <aadamc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Jul 5, 2022, at 2:00 PM, Nikita Timofeev <ntimof...@objectstyle.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Id like to add OSGi support to that removal list as well. >> >> OSGi support was developed in response to a user request (should be >> somewhere in the mailing list archives). I have no idea if anyone is still >> using it, and I am generally unclear on the state of OSGi these days. So how >> hard is it to keep it around? >> >> Andrus > > > > -- > Best regards, > Nikita Timofeev
