+1 - all links are valid - checksums and signatures are good - artifacts name contain “incubating” - build success on Ubuntu 22.04 JDK 17 x86 with the command: `build/make-distribution.sh -Pspark-3.3`
Cheng Pan > On Dec 22, 2023, at 12:16, Shaoyun Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > I checked the following things: > > - signatures are good. > ``` > gpg --import KEYS > gpg --verify apache-celeborn-0.3.2-incubating-source.tgz.asc > gpg --verify apache-celeborn-0.3.2-incubating-bin.tgz.asc > ``` > - checksums are good. > ``` > sha512sum --check apache-celeborn-0.3.2-incubating-source.tgz.sha512 > sha512sum --check apache-celeborn-0.3.2-incubating-bin.tgz.sha512 > ``` > - build success from source code. > ``` > ./build/make-distribution.sh -Pspark-3.2 > ./build/make-distribution.sh --release > ``` > > rexxiong <[email protected]> 于2023年12月22日周五 11:09写道： >> >> +1 (binding) >> I checked >> - Download links are valid. >> - git commit hash is correct >> - Checksums and signatures are valid. >> - No binary files in the source release >> - Files have the word incubating in their name. >> - DISCLAIMER,LICENSE and NOTICE files exist. >> >> Thanks, >> Jiashu Xiong >> >> Fu Chen <[email protected]> 于2023年12月21日周四 21:57写道： >> >>> +1 >>> >>> I checked >>> - download links are valid. >>> - git commit hash is correct. >>> - no binary files in the source release. >>> - signatures are good. >>> ``` >>> gpg --import KEYS >>> gpg --verify apache-celeborn-0.3.2-incubating-source.tgz.asc >>> gpg --verify apache-celeborn-0.3.2-incubating-bin.tgz.asc >>> ``` >>> - checksums are good. >>> ``` >>> sha512sum --check apache-celeborn-0.3.2-incubating-source.tgz.sha512 >>> sha512sum --check apache-celeborn-0.3.2-incubating-bin.tgz.sha512 >>> ``` >>> - build success from source code (Pop!_OS 22.04 LTS). >>> ``` >>> ./build/mvn clean package -DskipTests -Pspark-3.4 >>> ``` >>> >>> Keyong Zhou <[email protected]> 于2023年12月21日周四 16:55写道： >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> I checked >>>> - git commit hash is correct. >>>> - links are valid. >>>> - "incubating" is in the name. >>>> - PGP keys are good. >>>> - hashes are correct. >>>> - LICENSE looks good. >>>> - NOTICE looks good. >>>> - DISCLAIMER exists. >>>> - build success from source code (macOS). ``` >>> ./build/make-distribution.sh >>>> --release ``` >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Keyong Zhou >>>> >>>> Nicholas Jiang <[email protected]> 于2023年12月21日周四 14:06写道： >>>> >>>>> Hi Celeborn community, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Celeborn (Incubating) >>>>> 0.3.2-incubating-rc1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The git tag to be voted upon: >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-celeborn/releases/tag/v0.3.2-incubating-rc1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The git commit hash: >>>>> bce190d8a0a53434ef57ef33e53720f5bf4d14d6 source and binary artifacts >>> can >>>> be >>>>> found at: >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/celeborn/v0.3.2-incubating-rc1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The staging repo: >>>>> >>>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheceleborn-1045 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Fingerprint of the PGP key release artifacts are signed with: >>>>> D73CADC1DAB63BD3C770BB6D9476842D24B7C885 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> My public key to verify signatures can be found in: >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/celeborn/KEYS >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary >>>>> number of votes are reached. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please vote accordingly: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Checklist for release: >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist >>>>> Steps to validate the release: >>>>> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> * Download links, checksums and PGP signatures are valid. >>>>> * Source code distributions have correct names matching the current >>>>> release. >>>>> * Release files have the word incubating in their name. >>>>> * DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct. >>>>> * All files have license headers if necessary. >>>>> * No unlicensed compiled archives bundled in source archive. >>>>> * The source tarball matches the git tag. >>>>> * Build from source is successful. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Nicholas Jiang >>>> >>>
