I'd say this is something we need to decide for ourselves as the community in the first place. Shall we close the gap and propose the rest of the commiters to the PMC?
If, for any reason, it is a matter that is better to be discussed in private@ first - let's move the conversation there. -- Regards, Cos On April 11, 2018 9:52:02 PM GMT+03:00, Pepijn Noltes <pepijnnol...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi Roman, > >On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:11 PM Roman Shaposhnik ><ro...@shaposhnik.org> >wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Pepijn Noltes ><pepijnnol...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > It is time again for the board report. >> > If there are any question or remarks, please feel free to mention >them. >> > >> > >> > ## Description: >> > - Dynamic service framework for C and C++. >> > >> > ## Issues: >> > - there are no issues requiring board attention at this time >> > >> > ## Activity: >> > - Version 2.1.0 of Celix has been released. >> > - The usage of CMake is refactored so that target can be exported >and >> used >> > in other projects. This is more inline with modern cmake usage and >> > hopefully makes Apache Celix easier to use. >> > >> > ## Health report: >> > - The mailing list / jira active is normal for Apache Celix. >> > >> > ## PMC changes: >> > >> > - Currently 7 PMC members. >> > - No new PMC members added in the last 3 months >> > - Last PMC addition was Alexander Broekhuis on Wed Jul 16 2014 >> > >> > ## Committer base changes: >> > >> > - Currently 10 committers. >> > - No new committers added in the last 3 months >> > - Last committer addition was Roy Lenferink at Thu Feb 09 2017 >> >> When were the other 2 committers not on the PMC added? >> > >The last committers added to the PMC was during graduation. We >currently do >not add new committers default to the PMC. >The board asked some questions about this for the previous report and >answered that question with a mail to the board. >Do you think this needs to be addressed on the board report? > >Greetings, >Pepijn