> > Unfortunately, I do not have sufficient rights on > the repository to access the configuration parameters. Does anyone have the > rights to activate this integration?
Is this referring to the GitHub repo? If so, I think that has to go through the Apache Infrastructure group but I do not know for sure. Jeff On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Mignon, Laurent <laurent.mig...@acsone.eu> wrote: > Hi, > > I've refactored the testsuite of cmislib and put in place a CI based on > travis. > All the changes are available in a PR on github. > https://github.com/apache/chemistry-cmislib/pull/10 > Contrary to what was said previously there is no message sent to the ML > when a PR is created on github. > It also seems that the integration with travis is not enabled by default on > the project in github. Unfortunately, I do not have sufficient rights on > the repository to access the configuration parameters. Does anyone have the > rights to activate this integration? In the meantime, you can see the > results of the CI for this PR tests here: https: // > travis-ci.org/acsone/chemistry-cmislib/builds/292630173 > > Regards, > > Laurent Mignon > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Jeff Potts <jeffpott...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We actually discussed this quite a while ago and decided it was okay to > > move cmislib to git. However, upon looking at it, I realized that the > only > > difference was going to be the command line tool developers used. It was > > not going to make the project available on github (beyond what is already > > available with the mirror) and it didn't look like it was going to ease > > contributions through pull requests. > > > > So I am supportive of moving to git, even if it only means that the > people > > who contribute can use git instead of svn. > > > > But, I am curious as to exactly how the move will make the project more > > visible, make changes more visible, and make the review process simpler. > > > > Jeff > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 4:51 AM, Mignon, Laurent < > laurent.mig...@acsone.eu > > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Nick Burch <apa...@gagravarr.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Florian Müller wrote: > > > > > > > >> I like the idea of moving all Apache Chemistry projects to Git. It's > > > some > > > >> work, though. Someone has to drive it... > > > >> > > > > > > > > I think you already have github mirrors for all of them! > > > > https://github.com/apache?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=chemistry&type=&language= > > > > > > > > > > > I know that we already have a mirror but it's a mirror and you always > > have > > > to make the work twice. > > > > > > (If there's any missing just ask infra) > > > > > > > > > > > > We switched Apache Tika to git a year or so ago, and it's a > non-trivial > > > > amount of work, so you'd want to ensure you're actually getting > benefit > > > > from doing it... > > > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > What are the impacts? From what I find as information on > > chemistry-cmislib > > > it's difficult to assess the workload that this represents. The only > > > information I can find is that you have to make a ticket to the > support. > > > > > > The ASF provides CI servers which run on svn or git commits, you just > > have > > > > to ask for one to be turned on. The main two offerings are: > > > > * https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Jenkins > > > > * https://ci.apache.org/buildbot.html > > > > > > > > > To automate the tests of cmislib we must be able to install/access a > cmis > > > server (alfresco, nuxeo, ???). Do we have this kind of server available > > > somewhere? With travis or gitlabci, I know it's possible to install > this > > > kind of server before running the tests or to use a container with all > > the > > > required stuff pre installed. Is-it possible with the ASF CI servers? > > > > > > Another advantage with travis is that configuring your build is part of > > the > > > project sources. It is therefore possible to adapt it from one branch > to > > > another. This is a feature that is very important to me in anticipation > > of > > > adding python3 support. I know that for buildbot, this is not possible. > > > It's too long since I've used travis to know if it's possible with this > > > one. > > > > > > lmignon > > > > > >
