On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Daniel Spicar <[email protected]>wrote:
> Personally I don't care what is used but I think it is smarter to wait > before requiring Java 7. The security concern is not a valid argument IMHO > because the security is a matter of the JVM and not the code. If you are > concerned you can run Java 6 code in a maintained JVM (openjdk or a java 7 > one). > I wasn't arguing that we need to update for security reasons just that we are targerting our innovative software to a deprecated platform. Reto > > 2013/3/19 Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Rupert Westenthaler > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ...Apache Stanbol is compatible to Java 6 something that would no > longer > > > be possible if Clerezza would require Java 7. I would prefer to stay > > > with Java 6 unless their is a really important reason... > > > > +1, IMO it's a bit early to abandon Java 6 and I don't see compelling > > reasons. > > > > -Bertrand > > >
