On 28 March 2013 17:46, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Minto, > > I have to admit that I'm not much into XML. I'm surpised that I don't find > any reference to GRDDL in the paper. IIUC GRDDL is just one way why Gloze > is bidirectional.
Most of the XML -> RDF converters I've seen use XSLT, see for example - http://www.jenitennison.com/blog/node/142 (there are a load more XSLTs linked from https://delicious.com/danja/search?p=xslt ) GRDDL typically uses XSLT (because it's the only concrete approach defined in the spec) but there's a slight conceptual difference to arbitrary XML in that a GRDDL-compatible doc contains a reference (possibly very indirect) to the necessary transformation. So in a sense the XML doc *is* an RDF doc. I'm not familiar with Gloze, can't comment on the bidirectionality/rendering capabilities there. XSLT on RDF/XML tends to be very painful because of the number of different ways things can be expressed. Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com http://webbeep.it - text to tones and back again
