Hi Minto I think it would be fine to add the bundle to clerezza as I think it might be useful for others as well. We should find a way to have the platform modular so that one can easily add "optional" modules like CRIS, UIMA.
Cheers, Reto On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Minto van der Sluis <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi. > > Let me inform you about my usecase. > > We are creating a system for storing annotations. These annotations are > about errors and ommisions in other systems. Currently I use Clerezza > and a little layer on top for storing and retrieving these annotations. > Next on my list is integration with legacy systems using SOAP/XML > interfaces. This integration is 2-way, pushing triples in and turning > responses back into triples. > > Sure I could write code to extract information from annotation triples > and populate some xml structure. But to me this approach is too rigid > and has to be repeated for every legacy system I have to connect to. > Instead I want to reduce the amount of task specific code as much as > possible. Looking at what is available right now I could use a rendering > mechanism to go from triples to xml and xslt to go from xml to triples > again. However I mostly favour symmetric solutions (same technology used > in both directions) since they easy the maintenance burden and lower the > learning curve. > > I think I found the right building blocks to achieve a symmetric > solution. However, it still does require some serious effort by me to > get it working. These building blocks are Stanbol rules for rdf <--> rdf > conversions (---1--> ) and Gloze for xml <--> rdf conversions (---1--> > ). With these I can achieve the following: > > Annotation RDF ---1--> Legacy system RDF ---2--> legacy system xml > > and > > Legacy system xml ---2--> Legacy system RDF ---1--> Annotation RDF > > Most probably I am going to work in this for the coming weeks, unless my > manager pulls me back ;-) > > Whether or not Gloze would fit to be part of Clerezza I am not sure. But > that's a decision I leave up to you guys ;-) > > Regards, > > Minto > > -- > ir. ing. Minto van der Sluis > Software innovator / renovator > Xup BV > > Op 28-3-2013 17:46, Reto Bachmann-Gmür schreef: >> Hi Minto, >> >> I have to admit that I'm not much into XML. I'm surpised that I don't find >> any reference to GRDDL in the paper. IIUC GRDDL is just one way why Gloze >> is bidirectional. >> >> Is there a concrete usecase you see for Gloze in Clerezza? Could it >> possibly be used as an alternative rendering mechanism (mapping RDF to >> xhtml)? >> >> Cheers, >> Reto >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Minto van der Sluis <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> Thanks for the warm welcome :-) >>> >>> One of the things I need on my current assignment is mapping RDF to and >>> from Xml. I did some research and stumbled upon Gloze [1]. The original >>> author created a nice paper [2]. Also it appeared it got donated to Jena >>> back in 2006 [3]. Currently I am strongly thinking about porting Gloze >>> to Clerezza. I already asked the original author for his consent >>> (waiting for his reply). >>> >>> If there is any interest, I am more than happy to donate the results of >>> porting Gloze. >>> >>> However, in our line of work 2006 is an awful long time ago. So if you >>> know of anything similar / better please let me know. It might save me >>> an awful lot of work, in which case I owe you a beer :-) >>> >>> [1] https://code.google.com/p/gloze/ >>> [2] >>> >>> http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.88.8929&rep=rep1&type=pdf >>> [3] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/Import/Jena-SVN/Gloze/ >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> misl >>> >>> -- >>> ir. ing. Minto van der Sluis >>> Software innovator / renovator >>> Xup BV >>> >>> Mobiel: +31 (0) 626 014541 >>> >>> >
