Hi Rupert I agree re. the name. IIRC you recently fixed an issue in the current SingleTdbDatasetTcProvider. Do you remember what this was about?
Cheers, Reto On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Rupert Westenthaler <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am fine with replacing the SingleTdbDatasetTcProvider with the more > advanced ScalableSingleTdbDatasetTcProvider. However I would suggest > to keep SingleTdbDatasetTcProvider as name for the component. > > best > Rupert > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Minto van der Sluis <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> The SingleTdbDatasetTcProvider probably performs a little better for a >>> small number of graphs. Otherwise I see no real benefit. >> >> This seems to be a week reason for keeping those 817 lines of code. >> Maybe @Ruperts knows more reasons? >> >> Cheers, >> Reto > > > > -- > | Rupert Westenthaler [email protected] > | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 > | A-5500 Bischofshofen
